Communication
is always scored low in any organization. People have different perceptions
about communication. Few companies are not open and transparent and less
communicative. The culture is closed and everything is confidential and secret
in the organization. Assistants, secretaries and cheerleaders are powerful without
title. There is lot of scope for ambiguity. The gossiping is common and water
cooler discussions are hot. There are another few organizations who are very
communicative. They are open and transparent. Everything they do, they
communicate. Their intranet is always updated. Top management takes interest in
their people.
They communicate vision, mission, numbers, projects, programmes and regular updates. Still there is gossiping and water cooler discussions. Employees still think that they are not communicated properly.
They communicate vision, mission, numbers, projects, programmes and regular updates. Still there is gossiping and water cooler discussions. Employees still think that they are not communicated properly.
What may be the reasons for this? Why always employees see
the disconnect about the information companies share? I see the basic
fundamental issues and i.e. do your company have the internal communication
strategy? Oh, again strategy! You may ask the question, communication should be
simple so why to go in strategy, another corporate buzz word? Answer is how you
look it. You still can make it simple by using the simple information gathering
tool, yes, i.e. 5W & 1H.
You can design your strategy for each communication… before
doing any communication just ask following questions…
What you want to communicate?
Why you want to
communicate?
Who are the audience in communication? What is the level of
people?
Where you want to communicate?
When you want to communicate?
And most importantly How you want to communicate? What is
the mode of communication?
Sometimes, I always see people communicating something, but
the connection is missing. If you are speaking about numbers, I see, people
seating, in the room are blank. They even forget what they heard when they come
out of the room. I see the reason behind this. People don’t see, “what is in it
for me” factor. This can be avoided, when you are critical about the particular
communication you are doing.
Once you do the proper questioning on your communication,
go further by asking,
What exactly does this mean to the audience?
How does this relate to the audience (connect) what you are
communicating about?
What is the nature of impact you want to see after the
communication?
I think sometimes we forget the basics and try to find out
the solution from elsewhere by making whole system complex. Less communication
and over communication is always bad and may have the adverse impact on the
culture and people in the organization. Question is about right communication
at right moment at right place for right people.
Are you ready?
2 comments:
Strong commentary ! or Pragmatic and licit commentary.
Awesome,
Thank you so much for sharing such an awesome blog.....
corporate training companies in hyd
Post a Comment